Quick Stick Bili Mask - Easy On Bili Mask
Natus neoblue neo blue phototherapy light
Main Page - Inadequate Eye protection for my Grandson during phototherapy treatment. LETTER to Hospital Sources and Emails
|
The Quick-Stick Bili-Mask
has no straps,
is
held in place by
gentle adhesive, and is easy to
apply. This popular new Bili-Mask is faster and easier
to put on. Two small Velcro tabs with adhesive backing
are applied to the baby's temples. Then the mask is
simply placed over the eyes and fastened to the Velcro
tabs by touch. The mask can be removed and replaced as
often as desired without removing the tabs from the
baby's skin. The special hypo-allergenic adhesive on the
tabs is gentle enough to protect the baby's sensitive
skin and yet will hold the tabs securely in place when
properly applied. For
complete eye protection, the pad
itself is laminated of three layers of material. The two
outer layers of soft, absorbent fabric go against the
baby's eyes. A third layer, in the middle, consists of a
black, light-blocking foam. The mask is large enough to
completely cover the eyes and conform to the face. The
Quick-Stick Bili-Mask comes in two sizes. Sterile -
ready to use.
![]() The Easy-On Bili-Mask has two straps and has elastic for easier fit and light-tight eye protection. This type of Bili-Mask provides the convenience of a two strap design and still features full adjustment, stability and reliable eye protection. One strap encircles the head laterally, and the other strap goes across the top of the head. Both straps have sections of elastic so they can be adjusted to fit the head snugly yet gently. The straps fasten by touch to the Velcro surface on the front of the mask. Protection against bright phototherapy lights is provided by a large pad of soft, absorbent material next to the baby's eyes, which is covered with a layer of opaque black Velcro. The Easy-On Bili-Mask is available in two sizes. Sterile - ready to use.
52430 Quick-Stick Bili-Mask and 52420 Easy-On Bili-Mask
Gee, I wonder if not having his eyes properly protected could have contributed to or exacerbated it in any way? The bottom line and my main question now is:
Are these people not taking this issue seriously
enough, or is it not a serious issue to begin with,
as after all it's only an infant's eyes we are talking
about. It makes one wonder
just how many children's
severe eye problems SHOULD
BE linked to improper eye
care and protection during
phototherapy, yet is only linked
to prematurity? What's your opinion? If someone who reads this can help me with some of
the answers I'm looking for, please email me at
dannfox@comcast.net
Privacy Information: If you do email me, other than the reply from Natus, your replies will be confidential, if I do quote anything from your email I will not list your name on these web pages unless given permission to do so.
Main Page LETTER Sources and Emails Email Donna Share Your Story
My Webpages: http://www.mywoowoo.com/DonnaAnnFox/
|